Demonstrates improved P-wave velocity estimation in hydrocarbon identification, supporting rock physics integration.
Extracting dispersion information related to the frequency-dependent behavior of wave propagation from seismic data has become an effective method for hydrocarbon identification. However, existing approaches primarily rely on conventional frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset (FD-AVO) inversion, which provides only qualitative evaluations of elastic dispersion gradients without fully incorporating rock physics insights demonstrated by laboratory measurements and theoretical studies. A rock-physics-guided time-frequency AVO (TF-AVO) inversion framework is presented to bridge this gap by integrating rock physics knowledge with seismic data to enable quantitative estimation of P-wave velocity dispersion. Log-derived frequency-dependent velocities obtained from rock physics modeling are incorporated into the seismic inversion as physical constraints, ensuring consistency between predicted dispersion attributes and rock physics responses. A broadband rock physics modeling method is first established, from which frequency-dependent P-wave velocities and corresponding dispersion attributes are simulated using logging curves under the constraints of model-based inversion results. The modeled dispersion attribute is calibrated against well logs to quantify their sensitivity to gas-bearing intervals. Then, the log-derived frequency-dependent velocities are integrated with spectrally decomposed post-stack seismic data using waveform indication simulation to construct initial time-frequency models for TF-AVO inversion. The inversion is performed in the time-frequency domain through the limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) optimization algorithm to quantify frequency-dependent P-wave velocities. Field applications demonstrate that the estimated P-wave velocity dispersion exhibits improved consistency with gas saturation logs compared to the FD-AVO results, supporting both the validity of the adopted rock physics modeling and the effectiveness of the TF-AVO inversion. The proposed framework establishes a robust approach based on physical constraints for quantitative dispersion estimation, enhancing the reliability of hydrocarbon identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: