Key result
The Scolioscope demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.9) and accuracy, with an average difference from a sine bar of 0.03° for right-side and 0.18° for left-side measurements.
Why the study?
No research had evaluated the accuracy of left and right measurements in either digital or analog devices for scoliosis assessment.
Does the Scolioscope provide reliable and accurate measurements for scoliosis assessment?
Observational (n=30)
Does the Scolioscope provide reliable and accurate measurements for scoliosis assessment?
The Scolioscope is a highly accurate and reliable digital tool for scoliosis measurement.
Early detection of scoliosis with school screening and quick, easy, and reliable assessment of its progress are of paramount importance in the management of patients. There have been several tools described, with the most common being the analog scoliometer. Most recently, smartphone applications have entered this area with and without the use of sleeves for the device. There is no research that has evaluated the accuracy of measurements both left and right in either digital or analog devices. In this study, we evaluated the reliability and validity of a new digital scoliometer called the Scolioscope. Thirty subjects were included for the intra-rater reliability study. ICC values >0.9 were calculated both for same-day and between-day measurements. The device was highly accurate with an average difference from the ones set on the sine bar of 0.03° for right-side measurements and 0.18° for the left. These measurements suggest a highly accurate and reliable tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krekoukias et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Scoliosis (n=30). Scolioscope vs. Sine bar was evaluated on Intra-rater reliability and accuracy (ICC >0.9). The Scolioscope demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.9) and accuracy, with an average difference from a sine bar of 0.03° for right-side and 0.18° for left-side measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: