Two groups of eight individually caged female pigs, averaging 45 kg liveweight, were exposed alternately for 15-day periods to 21 and 6 °C for four consecutive periods. Four pigs in each group were restricted to 100 g of feed per unit of metabolic body weight and four were fed ad libitum. From regressions of liveweight vs. time for the last 10 days of each period, low temperature (6 °C) was found to reduce average daily gain by 2.3% per degree Centigrade below the rate of 792 g/day measured at 21 °C. Also, transitory liveweight changes were measured during the 5 days after each temperature changeover. With each temperature decrease (21 – 6 °C), there was a mean temporary loss in liveweight of 4% and with each temperature increase (6 – 21 °C), this temporary loss of 4% of liveweight was regained, at a constant level of feeding. While exposed to 6 °C, the digestibility of ration dry matter, energy and nitrogen (78.2%, 77.0% and 74.7%, respectively) was significantly lower than when pigs were exposed to 21 °C (80.8%, 79.9% and 79.4%, respectively). As a result of these findings, estimated changes in weight of gutfill were calculated from fecal output records. Regression analysis indicated that changes in gutfill could be responsible for about 55% of the observed temporary liveweight changes. Nitrogen balance data indicated that protein energy retention rates decreased by 1.0% per Celsius unit below the rate of 150 kJ/(day∙kg 0.75 ) measured at 21 °C. The ratio of protein gain to total weight gain was, on average, 25% larger at 6 °C, compared to that measured at 21 °C, indicating leaner growth at low temperature. The effects of feeding level were small compared to the effects of temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillips et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: