Key result
Biomechanical and structural analysis of canine and porcine chordae tendineae was performed to clarify whether changes in mechanical persistence correlate with structural alterations.
Why the study?
Studies assessing the biomechanical and structural properties of canine chordae tendineae were lacking.
This preclinical study provides foundational biomechanical and structural data on canine and porcine chordae tendineae to better understand the mechanisms of rupture in degenerative mitral valve disease.
Animal chordae data require human validation before clinical use; leaves open mechanistic links in valvular disease.
The mitral valve apparatus is a complex structure consisting of the mitral ring, valve leaflets, papillary muscles and Chordae tendineae (CT). The latter are mainly responsible for the mechanical functions of the valve. Our study included investigations of the biomechanical and structural properties of CT collected from canine and porcine hearts, as there are no studies about these properties of canine CT. We performed a static uniaxial tensile test on CT samples and a histopathological analysis in order to examine their microstructure. The results were analyzed to clarify whether the changes in mechanical persistence of Chordae tendineae are combined with the alterations in their structure. This study offers clinical insight for future research, allowing for an understanding of the process of Chordae tendineae rupture that happens during degenerative mitral valve disease—the most common heart disease in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gach et al. (2021) studied Degenerative mitral valve disease. Biomechanical and structural analysis was evaluated on Correlation between mechanical persistence and structural alterations of Chordae tendineae. Biomechanical and structural analysis of canine and porcine chordae tendineae was performed to clarify whether changes in mechanical persistence correlate with structural alterations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: