Key result
A novel local pre-operative risk prediction model showed significantly better discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the logistic EuroSCORE (AUC 0.857 vs 0.821; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does a novel local pre-operative risk prediction model improve in-hospital mortality prediction compared to the EuroSCORE in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Observational (n=5,029)
No
Does a novel local pre-operative risk prediction model improve in-hospital mortality prediction compared to the EuroSCORE in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.857% vs 0.821%
p-value: p=0.02
A simple, locally developed pre-operative risk model demonstrated superior discrimination for in-hospital mortality compared to the logistic EuroSCORE in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
Supports local risk model development; leaves open external validation and outcome impact before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Several models for prediction of early mortality after open-heart surgery have been developed. Our objectives were to develop a local mortality risk prediction model, compare it with the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), and investigate whether the addition of intra-operative variables could enhance the accuracy of risk prediction. METHODS: All 5029 patients undergoing open-heart surgery in 2000-2007 were included in the study. Logistic regression with bootstrap methods was used to develop a pre-operative risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality. Next, several intra-operative variables were added to the pre-operative model. Calibration and discrimination were assessed, and the model was internally validated for prediction in future datasets. We thereafter compared the pre-operative model with the additive and logistic EuroSCOREs. RESULTS: Our pre-operative model included eight risk factors that are routinely registered in our department: age, gender, degree of urgency, operation type, previous cardiac surgery, and renal, cardiac, and pulmonary dysfunction. The model estimated mortality accurately throughout the dataset except in the 1% of patients at extremely high risk, in which mortality was somewhat overestimated. The estimated shrinkage factor was 0.930. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for our pre-operative model and the logistic EuroSCORE were 0.857(0.823-0.891) and 0.821(0.785-0.857) (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in performance between the pre-operative and the intra-operative model (P>0.10). CONCLUSION: Our pre-operative model was simple and easy to use, and showed good predictive ability in our population. Internal validation indicated that it would accurately predict mortality in a future dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berg et al. (2011) conducted an observational in open-heart surgery (n=5,029). Local pre-operative mortality risk prediction model vs. logistic EuroSCORE was evaluated on in-hospital mortality (AUC for discrimination) (p=0.02). A novel local pre-operative risk prediction model showed significantly better discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the logistic EuroSCORE (AUC 0.857 vs 0.821; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: