Adverse adiposity variants (UFA) increased the risk of cardiometabolic diseases, whereas favorable variants (FA) were protective and associated with lower liver fat.
Observational
Do different adiposity genetic variants (favorable vs unfavorable) have opposing effects on ectopic fat distribution and the risk of cardiometabolic diseases?
Distinct genetic adiposity phenotypes exist, where 'favorable' adiposity variants protect against cardiometabolic disease and are associated with lower liver fat, contrasting with 'unfavorable' variants.
To understand the causal role of adiposity and ectopic fat in type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic diseases, we aimed to identify two clusters of adiposity genetic variants: one with "adverse" metabolic effects (UFA) and the other with, paradoxically, "favorable" metabolic effects (FA). We performed a multivariate genome-wide association study using body fat percentage and metabolic biomarkers from UK Biobank and identified 38 UFA and 36 FA variants. Adiposity-increasing alleles were associated with an adverse metabolic profile, higher risk of disease, higher CRP, and higher fat in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, liver, and pancreas for UFA and a favorable metabolic profile, lower risk of disease, higher CRP and higher subcutaneous adipose tissue but lower liver fat for FA. We detected no sexual dimorphism. The Mendelian randomization studies provided evidence for a risk-increasing effect of UFA and protective effect of FA for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, stroke, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and polycystic ovary syndrome. FA is distinct from UFA by its association with lower liver fat and protection from cardiometabolic diseases; it was not associated with visceral or pancreatic fat. Understanding the difference in FA and UFA may lead to new insights in preventing, predicting, and treating cardiometabolic diseases.
Martin et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic diseases. Adiposity genetic variants (UFA and FA) was evaluated on Risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, stroke, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Adverse adiposity variants (UFA) increased the risk of cardiometabolic diseases, whereas favorable variants (FA) were protective and associated with lower liver fat.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: