Why the study?
Do field dependent Type A individuals exhibit higher levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides than field independent Type A individuals?
Do field dependent Type A individuals exhibit higher levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides than field independent Type A individuals?
Field dependence may act as a mediating personality factor that influences autonomic arousal and coronary risk, as reflected by higher atherogenic lipid profiles in field dependent Type A individuals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association warrants no practice change; leaves open whether field dependence mediates coronary risk via lipids.
Given evidence that individual differences on the cognitive style dimension of field dependence/independence are significantly related to sympathetically mediated cardiovascular functioning and lipid metabolism, a correlational study was designed to examine associations between Type A behavior, field dependence, and serum lipids. It was hypothesized that field dependent Type A individuals would exhibit higher levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides than would field independent Type A individuals. Using 82 medical students as subjects, the hypothesis was supported among both males and females for total cholesterol, with a trend in the predicted direction for triglycerides. Field dependent Type A individuals of both sexes were also found to have a higher level of low-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol, when compared to their field independent Type A counterparts. The overall pattern of findings provides suggestive evidence that field dependence is an important mediating personality factor influencing levels of autonomic arousal and coronary risk among Type A individuals. Alternative explanations as to why field dependent Type A individuals may be more chronically aroused in response to environmental stimuli are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCranie et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: