Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that histologically resembles high-grade mammary duct carcinoma. Because of the rarity of this entity, data verifying the association between histologic features and patient survival are limited. We conducted a comprehensive histologic review of 151 SDC cases and performed an analysis of the association between various histomorphologic parameters and the clinical outcome with the aim of developing a histologic risk stratification model that predicts the prognosis of SDC patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that prominent nuclear pleomorphism (overall survival [OS]: P=0.013; progression-free survival [PFS]: P=0.019), ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF (PFS: P=0.013), high tumor budding (OS: P=0.011; PFS: P<0.001), and high poorly differentiated clusters (OS: P<0.001; PFS: P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with vascular invasion demonstrated a marginally significant association with shorter PFS (P=0.064) in a multivariate analysis. We proposed a 3-tier histologic risk stratification model based on the total number of positive factors among 4 prognostically relevant parameters (prominent nuclear pleomorphism, ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF, vascular invasion, and high poorly differentiated clusters). The OS and PFS of patients with low-risk (0 to 1 point) (23% of cases), intermediate-risk (2 to 3 points) (54% of cases), and high-risk (4 points) (23% of cases) tumors progressively deteriorated in this order (hazard ratio, 2.13 and 2.28, and 4.99 and 4.50, respectively; Ptrend<0.001). Our histologic risk stratification model could effectively predict patient survival and may be a useful aid to guide clinical decision-making in relation to the management of patients with SDC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakaguro et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: