The metallocene(IV) halogeno-alkyls [M(η-C5H5)2RX][type (i) R = CH2SnMe3, X = Cl or Br, M = Ti (also X = I), Zr, or Hf; type (ii) R = CH2SiMe3, X = Cl or Br, M = Ti, Zr, or Hf; type (iii) R = CH2GeMe3, X = Cl, M = Ti] have been prepared either by interaction of the appropriate Grignard reagent and [M(η-C5H5)2Cl2] or from [M(η-C5H5)2RCl] and Mg(CH2SnMe3)X (Cl–X exchange). Metallocene(IV) dialkyls [M(η-C5H5)2RR′][type (iv) R = CH2SnMe3= R′, M = Ti, Zr, or Hf; type (v) R = CH2SnMe3, R′= CH2SiMe3, M = Ti, Zr, or Hf; type (vi) R = CH2CMe3= R′, M = Ti or Zr; type (vii) R = CH2SnMe3; R′= CH2CMe3, CH2GeMe3, or Me; M = Ti; type(viii) R = CH2SiMe3, R′= CH2GeMe3, M = Ti; type (ix) R = CH(SiMe3)2; R′= Me, Et, Prn, CH2SiMe3, or Ph; M = Zr] have been synthesised by reaction of (a)[for type (v)][M(η-C5H5)2] with 2Mg(CH2SnMe3)X (X = Cl or Br) or (b)[M(η-C5H5)2RX] with LiR′. Also obtained are [Ti(η-C5H5)2Cl(OCH2SiMe3)] and [{Zr(η-C5H5)2[CH(SiMe3)2]H}2], the latter from [Zr(η-C5H5)2{CH(SiMe3)2}Cl] and Li[AlH4] or [Zr(η-C5H5)2Cl2] and successively Li[AlH(OBut)3] and Li[CH(SiMe3)2]. The reaction of an equimolar portion of HCl in OEt2 and [Ti(C5H5)2(CH2SnMe3)Cl] gives predominantly the products of CH2–SnMe3, rather than Ti–CH2, scission. By contrast, the dialkyls [M(η-C5H5)2RR′], containing one or two CH2SnMe3 ligands, give largely RH or R′H and [M(η-C5H5)2Cl (R′ or R)]; the relative ability of R as a leaving group decreases in the sequence CH2SnMe3 > CH2CMe3 > CH2SiMe3 CH2GeMe3 > CH3, the distinctions being more marked for Ti than Zr or Hf. The dialkyls are generally stable when heated at 80 °C in PhMe, except for the titanium complexes; [Ti(η-C5H5)2(CH2M′Me3)2](M′= Si or Ge) gives M′Me4 as the sole volatile product, with t½ 110 (M′= Si) or 140 min (M′= Sn). Treatment of [Zr(η-C5H5)2RX][type (ix)] in C6H6 with CO under ambient conditions affords the appropriate η2-acyl [Zr(η-C5H5)2(η2-COR)X][type (x), R = CH2CMe3 or CH2SiMe3, X = Cl or R; or type (xi), R = CH(SiMe3)2, X = Me]; the formation of type (xi), rather than the isomer resulting from CO insertion into the less hindered Zr–Me bond, is noteworthy. A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study has been carried out on [Zr(η-C5H5)2(CH2M′Me3)2][M′= C, (28) or Si, (42)]. Crystals of complex (28) are tetragonal, space group I, with a= 9.142(4), b= 9.142(4), c= 23.326(9)Å, β= 90°, and Z= 4. Crystals of (42) are monoclinic, space group P21/n, a= 13.745(6), b= 7.048(3), c= 22.057(9)Å, β= 95.65(4)°, and Z= 4. For complex (28), 487 reflections have been considered and the data refined to R= 0.029, R′= 0.032; for complex (42), 2 688 independent reflections led to R= 0.029, R′= 0.033. The slightly larger steric requirement of the neopentyl ligand compared with –CH2SiMe3 manifests itself in a larger Zr–cyclopentadienyl approach but the Zr–CH2 bond length is indistinguishable, 2.51 (2)Å for (28) and 2.52(2)Å for (42).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffery et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: