Key result
Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death compared with rivaroxaban in cancer patients with VTE or AF (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98).
Why the study?
This study assessed mortality outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation.
Does dabigatran reduce cancer-related death in patients with active cancers and VTE or AF compared to rivaroxaban?
Cohort (n=3,591)
Does dabigatran reduce cancer-related death in patients with active cancers and VTE or AF compared to rivaroxaban?
In patients with active cancer and VTE or AF, dabigatran was associated with lower mortality and bleeding risks compared to rivaroxaban in a retrospective cohort.
Does not support changing practice yet; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in cancer VTE or AF.
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the mortality outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Medical records of cancer patients receiving NOACs for VTE or AF between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database. NOACs were compared using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. The primary outcome was cancer-related death. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. RESULTS: Among 202,754 patients who received anticoagulants, 3591 patients (dabigatran: 907; rivaroxaban: 2684) with active cancers were studied. Patients who received dabigatran were associated with lower risks of cancer-related death at one year (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.93) and at the end of follow-ups (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.98) compared with rivaroxaban. Patients who received dabigatran were also associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97), major bleeding (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47-0.88), and GI bleeding (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.84) at the end of follow-ups compared with rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Compared with rivaroxaban, the use of dabigatran may be associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death and all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Active cancer with venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation (n=3,591). Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Cancer-related death (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death compared with rivaroxaban in cancer patients with VTE or AF (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: