Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twenty subjects listened to CNC word lists compressed at a 2: 1 compression ratio using four different discard intervals, 40, 50, 60, and 70 milliseconds. The stimuli were presented to the subjects both dichotically and diotically. Results indicated a clear advantage in word intelligibility of time-compressed speech at discard intervals from 40 to 70 milliseconds when the signal was presented dichotically. Intelligibility was found to decline rapidly, however, under diotic presentation when the discard interval exceeded 50 to 60 milliseconds. Intelligibility scores for all discard intervals, dichotic presentation, remained above 90%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerber et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: