Key result
Power output during an individual time trial was more evenly distributed (EVA SD 2.81) compared with short-circuit/criterium events (4.23) and road race events (4.81) in elite female cyclists.
Observational (n=9)
Exposure variation analysis reveals that power output distribution in elite female cyclists is highly variable and differs significantly across race formats.
Power output evenness differs by race format in elite female cyclists; hypothesis-generating for pacing interventions and performance trials.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, the amplitude and time distribution of power output in a variety of competitive cycling events through the use of a new mathematical analysis was examined: exposure variation analysis (EVA). DESIGN: Descriptive field study. SETTING: Various professional road cycling events, including; a 5-day-eight-stage tour race, a 1-day World Cup event and the Australian National Individual Time Trial Championships. PARTICIPANTS: 9 elite female cyclists (mean (SD), mass = 57.8 (3.4) kg, height = 167.3 (2.8) cm, Vo(2)peak = 63.2 (5.2) ml kg(-1) min(-1)). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The variation in power output and the quantification of the total time and acute time spent at various exercise intensities during competitive professional cycling were examined. Predefined levels of exercise intensity that elicited first ventilation threshold, second ventilation threshold and maximal aerobic power were determined from a graded exercise test performed before the events and compared with power output during each event. RESULTS: EVA exposed that power output during the time trial was highly variable (EVA(SD) = 2.81 (0.33)) but more evenly distributed than the circuit/criterium (4.23 (0.31)) and road race events (4.81 (0.96)). CONCLUSION: EVA may be useful for illustrating variations in the amplitude and time distribution of power output during cycling events. The specific race format influenced not only the overall time spent in various power bands, but also the acute time spent at these exercise intensities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbiss et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Healthy elite female road cyclists (n=9). Competitive cycling events (time trial vs circuit/criterium vs road race) vs. Different race formats compared to each other was evaluated on Exposure variation analysis standard deviation (EVA SD) of power output (p=0.009). Power output during an individual time trial was more evenly distributed (EVA SD 2.81) compared with short-circuit/criterium events (4.23) and road race events (4.81) in elite female cyclists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: