Numerous algorithms have been proposed for detecting road subsurface defects using data from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). However, GPR operates across multiple display formats, and existing methods typically rely on a single display format for analysis. Our comprehensive tests have shown that different GPR display formats vary in their effectiveness at detecting specific types of defects; certain formats may be optimal for one type of defect but less effective for another. Therefore, this study has conducted a comparative analysis using the YOLOv7 framework as the benchmark model to assess the impact of different display formats and multi-image feature fusion modes (pixel-level fusion, feature-level fusion, and decision-level fusion) on the detection outcomes of subsurface defects. Using a dataset of actual road subsurface defects for validation, the results demonstrate that different GPR display formats excel at detecting specific types of road subsurface defects. The decision-level fusion method notably enhances detection accuracy and recall rates, with improvements of 2.78% for cavities and 10% for cracks compared to single-input modes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: