Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A crystal plasticity model incorporating anisotropic elasticity and slip-based viscoplasticity was developed to investigate local deformation in Ni-based single-crystal superalloy turbine blade fir-tree roots. The proposed model captures the activation of both { 111 } < 110 > and { 111 } < 112 > slip systems through < 110 > − < 112 > dislocation reactions. Compared to the isotropic elastic–plastic model, the crystal plasticity model predicted significantly higher local fields at the edge of the contact region, with a 16.4 % higher peak equivalent stress (1109 MPa) and a 5.3 % greater peak equivalent strain (0.02). These differences are attributed to two mechanisms uniquely captured by the crystal plasticity model: (1) local elastic stiffening due to a shift in the principal stress direction from < 001 > to < 111 > under multiaxial loading and (2) accelerated shear accumulation driven by dislocation reactions. These results underscore the importance of using micromechanism-based models to assess the structural integrity of Ni-based single-crystal superalloy turbine blades. ● Developed anisotropic elasto-viscoplastic crystal plasticity model for Ni-based single crystal superalloys. ● Model uses <110>-<112> dislocation reactions and {111}<110>/{111}<112> slip systems for anisotropic deformation prediction. ● CP-FEM simulations show 16.4 % higher stress and 5.3 % larger strain at edge of contact vs. isotropic model. ● Multiaxial stresses at the edge of contact cause elastic stiffening and accelerated shear accumulation. ● Model supports structural integrity evaluation of turbine blade fir tree by capturing anisotropic deformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: