Seven donor−acceptor copolymers incorporating didecyloxyphenylene ( DP ) donor and the following acceptors—thieno[3,4- b ]pyrazine ( TP ), 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( BT ), quinoxaline ( Q ), pyridine ( Py ), 2,3-dimethyl-5,7-dithien-2-yl-thieno[3,4- b ]pyrazine ( DTTP ), 4,7-dithien-2-yl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( DTBT ), and 2,3-dimethyl-5,7-dithien-2-yl-quinoxaline ( DTQ )—were synthesized by Suzuki coupling polymerization. The effects of the acceptor strength and backbone planarity on the optical, electrochemical, field-effect charge transport, and photovoltaic properties of the donor−acceptor copolymers were investigated. The optical band gap (eV) of the copolymers showed the trend of DP/TP (1.47) < DP/BT (2.37) < DP/Py (2.76) < DP/Q (2.78) < DP / P (3.15). The DP/TP copolymer had a field-effect hole mobility of 1.89 × 10 −3 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . The DP/DTBT and DP/DTQ copolymers showed hole mobilities of 1.92 × 10 −4 and 2.10 × 10 −3 cm 2 V −1 s −1, respectively. The strong acceptor strength of TP and coplanar backbone in the DP/TP copolymer resulted in a large intramolecular charge transfer, leading to the observed charge transport and optical properties.. These results show that the backbone planarity of the DP / BT and DP / Q copolymers was significantly improved by incorporating thiophene moieties, leading to enhanced charge transport. Photovoltaic cells fabricated from DP/DTBT and DP/DTQ polymers blended with [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) showed power conversion efficiencies of 0.40−0.41% under AM 1.5 solar simulator illumination (100 mW/cm 2 ). The results of the present study show that the electronic and optoelectronic properties of dialkoxylphenylene-based donor−acceptor copolymers could be tuned through the acceptor structure and backbone coplanarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: