The authors proposed a comparison between 2 simplified flame models. The first flame model uses the radiant surface approach with a new analytical expression for the heat flux. The second one is derived from the Radiative Transfer Equation. The fire front has been considered as a line characterized by some geometric and physical parameters. Two assumptions are used to model the flame, either a radiant plane or a volumetric flame. The flame parameters have been identified from experiments using video records and applying an inverse method. These two models were tested against fires carried out in a fire tunnel and found to perform very well considering the complicate nature of the flame geometry and flame characteristics. The need to determine the heat flux from a large-scale fire has lead to make a number of assumptions. By means of the proposed modeling, the authors try to determine the extent to which the range of assumptions made disqualifies some simplified flame models from use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: