The conformation and the dynamic structure of single‐stranded poly(U) and poly(C) in neutral aqueous solution have been investigated by 1 H‐nmr at two different frequencies (90 and 250 MHz) and at various temperatures. Measurements of proton chemical shifts, coupling constants J H‐H , and proton relaxation times, T 1 , T 2 , versus temperature show a striking difference in conformation and in dynamic structure between the two polynucleotides studied. The temperature effect on δ and J H‐H is found to be substantial for poly(C) and insignificant for poly(U). The S conformer is favored in poly(U), whereas the N conformer strongly predominates in poly(C) (≃90%), similar to the case for RNAs. These results suggest that single‐stranded poly(C) probably possesses a helical or partial helical structure, whereas poly(U) shows a clear preference for the random coil, in agreement with the optical results. The local motions of the ribose and base were studied at various temperatures by measurements on the relaxation times at 90 and 250 MHz. For a given temperature between 22 and 72°C, the ratio T 1 (90)/ T 1 (250) is practically the same for all poly(U) protons, indicating that in this temperature interval the ribose base unit of poly(U) undergoes an isotropic motion characterized by a single correlation time τ c . Above 52°C, poly(C) exhibits a dynamic structure similar to poly(U). Below this temperature, poly(C) exists in an equilibrium between randomly coiled and single‐stranded helix forms. This situation is characterized by a strong cross‐relaxation effect and T 1 values corresponding to a relatively short apparent correlation time. An activation energy of 4 kcal/mol was determined for the motion of the ribose–base unit in both single‐stranded polynucleotides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neumann et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: