“The [Gillick] case is the beginning not the conclusion of a legal development in a field glimpsed by one or two judges in recent times but not yet fully explored. Mrs. Gillick, even though she may lose the appeal, has performed a notable public service in directing judicial attention to the problems arising from the interaction of parental right and a doctor's duty in a field of medicine unknown to our fathers but of immense consequence to our society.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. P. de Cruz (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: