This seminar report highlights the severe resource limitations and challenges facing nephrology and dialysis care in Ukraine in 1998.
John H. Dirks, co-chair of COMGAN (Commission for Global Advancement of Nephrology) had visited Professor L. Pyrih (President of the Ukrainian Nephrological Association and Chief of the Department of Urology and Nephrology, Institute of AMS, Kiev) in Kiev in early 1998. They identified the need to provide updated information on clinical nephrology to Ukrainian physicians. This led to the decision, supported by Professor Vladmir Nikolaev (Section of Artificial Organs of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) to organize a 2 day course on nephrology and hypertension. The meeting was arranged by the Kuratorium Gesellschaft für Nephrologie, the Ukrainian Nephrological Association, the Joint Action of Nephrology in Central And Eastern Europe (International Society of Nephrology, European Renal Association and Gesellschaft Nephrologie). A total of 97 physicians participated at the seminar coming from all regions of the Ukraine, particularly from the Universities/Academies in Kiev, Lviv, Kharkiv and Donetsk. Professor L. Pyrih informed the foreign visitors about the state of nephrology in the Ukraine. Nephrology was established as a clinical discipline in 1965 in Kiev. Currently there are 23 regional nephrological departments with a total of 326 clinical nephrologists. The number of nephrological beds in the Ukraine is currently 3000, i.e. 0.59 beds/10000 of population. Because of the grave economic situation, access to expensive medication such as glucocorticosteroids, cytostatic agents etc, is very limited. Haemodialysis treatment was first performed in Kiev in 1969 as reported by Professor E. Baran (specialist in haemodialysis and transplantation, Public Health Ministry of Ukraine). A major breakthrough occurred in the years of Perestroyka and with the beginning of Ukrainian independence (1988/1993), but further development was halted by the developing economic crisis. There are currently 200 dialysis centres which treat more than 800 patients with end-stage renal failure. Because of limited financial resources many centres provide treatment only to one or two dialysis sessions per week. Most dialysis units don't have access to water purification. Patients on dialysis programmes have no access to treatment with vitamins or recombinant erythropoietin. As the combined result of the above shortcomings 1-year survival is 50–80%. Haemodialysis is primarily viewed as a temporary measure to bridge over the time until kidney transplantation can be performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyrih et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: