Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The arylcyclopropanone methyl hemiacetals (aryl = C 6 H 5 , p ‐ClC 6 H 4 and p ‐CH 3 C 6 H 4 ) are quantitatively isomerised by sodium methoxide or tert ‐amines to propionic esters. The ring fission is rapid and occurs exclusively at the C 1 ‐C 2 position, leading to products derived from the most stable incipient carbanion. The hemiacetals react with acids via a Woodward‐Hoffmann cleavage of the C 1 ‐C 3 cyclopropyl bond, affording a mixture of 1‐ and 3‐substituted arylacetones, the ratio of which depends on the nature of the acid. This acid‐catalysed C 2 ‐C 3 ring‐fission only occurs when an aryl group is present. The unsubstituted cyclopropanone hemiacetal isomerises in (weak) acid to the propionic ester (C 1 ‐C 2 rupture). The transformation of arylcyclopropanone methyl hemiacetals in acidified methanol to α‐aryl‐α‐methoxy‐acetones, is first order in the hemiacetal. From the rate constants a Hammett ρ value of −0.7 is obtained, thus showing a small interaction of the aryl group with the remote reaction centre. This is considered to support a mechanism in which arylcyclopropanone is an essential intermediate. Subsequent protonation of this ketone with simultaneous C 2 ‐C 3 bond rupture gives the substituted 2‐hydroxyallylic cation. For this step an approximate ρ value of −2.9 is calculated, thus indicating that this step is much more sensitive to the presence of a ( para ) substituent in the aromatic ring. Further evidence for the occurrence of an intermediate arylcyclopropanone is the alkoxy exchange in the starting material when CD 3 OD or n ‐propanol is used as solvent. The proposed mechanism is also consistent with the observed stability of the corresponding arylcyclopropanone acetals under similar acidic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakker et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: