OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate the utility of the conventional criteria for clinical chorioamnionitis in the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) in preterm birth. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Seoul, Republic of Korea. SAMPLE: A total of 1468 singleton births between 24 and 34 weeks due to preterm labour (n = 713) or preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (n = 755). METHOD: We evaluated three diagnostic categories of clinical chorioamnionitis: Criteria 1, conventional criteria; Criteria 2, combination of any three conventional parameters without prerequisite fever; Criteria 3, Criteria 1 plus positive maternal C-reactive protein and neutrophil left-shift into minor criteria. EONS included proven or suspected sepsis within 7 days following birth. Neonatal morbidity and mortality of EONS were also reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance of three combinations. RESULTS: The prevalence of EONS was 13.8%. Among 203 cases of EONS, maternal manifestation of clinical chorioamnionitis by criteria 1 was evident in only one out of seven, indicating 15.3% sensitivity for EONS prediction. However, with application of criteria 2, sensitivity significantly increased to 34.0%, while compromising specificity from 92.3% to 78.7%. Criteria 3 showed similar diagnostic performance compared with criteria 1 (sensitivity 16.7%, specificity 91.6%). Overall, neonatal mortality and neonatal composite morbidity in EONS were 14.9% and 67.8%, respectively, and there was no difference in neonatal morbidity and mortality between neonates whose mothers showed fever as a sign of clinical chorioamnionitis and those whose mothers did not. CONCLUSION: The renouncement of fever as a prerequisite for the criteria of clinical chorioamnionitis could increase sensitivity for the identification of EONS, a serious outcome of preterm birth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The renouncement of fever as an essential can increase sensitivity for prediction of neonatal sepsis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: