The increased presence of openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students and faculties underscores a fundamental epistemological break between campus diversity and inclusion. Universities will proudly announce their commitments to a diverse community of learners but will offer very limited possibilities for meaningful inclusion. Most diversity initiatives are indeed based on a hypothesis that every disenfranchised group can, within the academy, create an inclusive space. This essay's primary focus is on deconstructing the manner in which a ‘safe zone’ project became the focal point for an administrative office and an academic program to co-opt in an attempt to ‘own’ this dimension of diversity, in other words, the LGBTQ on this campus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvarez et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: