Although paleoflood reconstructions are frequently used to provide discharge estimates of extreme floods, a concern remains regarding uncertainty in Manning's n-values. An analysis of this uncertainty relative to a commonly used step-backwater model was performed for channel reaches in five canyon rivers. Values of n were selected for each study reach using four methods. Each set of n-values was then varied by ±10% and ±25%. The percentage change in discharge associated with varying n-values is inversely proportional to channel gradient and to width/depth ratio, and proportional to roughness. For channels with a gradient less than or equal to approximately 0.01, varying n by ±25% produces a maximum change of 20% in discharge. The greatest discrepancy among n-values estimated using the four methods occurred for channels with relatively low gradient and low roughness, but associated discharge varied fairly consistently between 13 and 27%. These results indicate that uncertainties in discharge estimation resulting from the roughness coefficient in step-backwater modeling of paleofloods are comparable to or lower than uncertainties associated with other methods of indirectly estimating flood discharges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellen Wohl (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: