Kirzner’s theory of entrepreneurship has far-reaching consequences. It explains the coordination of markets and of knowledge. It explains how individual entrepreneurs generate the process of economic development. And it combines Mises’s view of the market as an entrepreneurial process with Hayek’s view of the market as a means of transmitting and coordinating knowledge (Kirzner 2000; Harper 2003). Like other theories concerned with entrepreneurship and economic development processes, Kirzner’s theory is non-spatial. While this may simplify and therefore illuminate the analysis of key mechanisms of the entrepreneurial process, it also obscures some of its inherently spatial outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to extend Kirzner’s theory by explicitly introducing the role of space in entrepreneurial alertness and the coordination of markets. A spatial extension of the theory of entrepreneurship helps explain several of the most common phenomena associated with economic development, such as urbanization, migration, and changes to the profit opportunities that
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Emanuel Andersson (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: