Observational study finds stromal T-lymphocyte density predicts PD-L1 positivity in early breast cancer, indicating immune infiltration is a superior biomarker to molecular subtype.
INTRODUCTION: Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 as a biomarker in breast cancer remains controversial. While some studies suggest its association with negative prognostic parameters, others reported a highly significant association between PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which are known to be an independent favorable prognostic factor. The aim of present study is to examine the relationship between immune response markers and PD-L1 expression in early breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1, along with density and composition of stromal lymphocytic infiltrate and peritumoral lymphoid aggregates was analyzed in 95 samples of invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and the density of stromal lymphocytic infiltrate and peritumoral lymphoid aggregates was identified and a cut-off value of 53% coverage of tumor stroma by lymphocytes, with which PD-L1 positivity can be predicted with excellent diagnostic accuracy, was determined for the first time using statistical methods. Additionally, PD-L1 positivity was observed significantly more often in tumors with higher absolute number of both CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes in the stromal infiltrate. No significant correlation with molecular subtype of breast cancer was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the density of stromal lymphocytic infiltrate might be a better predictor of PD-L1 positivity in early breast cancer than the molecular subtype and that the key to the optimization of PD-L1 as a biomarker in breast cancer lies in its interpretation in the context of other immune response markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vučinić et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: