This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The accuracy of new molecular diagnostics, fluoresence in situ hybridization or quantitative fluorescence-PCR (collectively known as rapid aneuploidy screening), in prenatal diagnosis has already been demonstrated in a number of large studies. The challenge now is how to apply them clinically in the most cost-effective manner. It is now time to appraise whether rapid aneuploidy screening can replace traditional karyotyping when amniocenteses are performed for increased risk of Down's syndrome by maternal serum screening or advanced maternal age in the absence of ultrasound abnormality. The ten most recent studies from the literature within this research theme are reviewed and the pros and cons of this new approach in prenatal diagnosis are discussed, including the suggestion of future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: