Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fiorella and Cloft and authors Zaidat et al. discuss the impending oversupply of neurointerventionalists and echo debates ongoing in many medical subspecialties, namely, how to construct barriers to decrease the number of people entering a field.Between 2005 and 2007, the United Council of Neurologic Subspecialties created 7 new board examinations, complete with rigid application requirements.It is hard not to view these barriers as potentially self-serving.Many of the people initiating additional fellowships and new board examinations have managed well in their fields without those hurdles.While it is difficult to argue against more education, these requirements have a time and financial cost for trainees (and their departments) and could contribute to fragmentation within the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiorella et al. (2013) conducted a letter in Endovascular ischemic stroke. Neurointerventional subspecialty board examinations and training barriers was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: