Comparing two samples with a continuous non-negative score, e.g. a utility score over [0, 1], with a substantial proportion, say 50 per cent, scoring 0 presents distributional problems for most standard tests. A Wilcoxon rank test can be used, but the large number of ties reduces power. I propose a new test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test performed after removing an equal (and maximal) number of 0's from each sample. This test recovers much of the power. Compared with a (directional) modification of a two-part test proposed by Lachenbruch, the truncated Wilcoxon has similar power when the non-zero scores are independent of the proportion of zeros, but, unlike the two-part test, the truncated Wilcoxon is relatively unaffected when these processes are dependent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfred P. Hallstrom (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: