Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of donor–acceptor (D–A) conjugated polymers (CPs) comprising dithieno[2,3- b;7,6- b ]carbazole ( C1 ) or dithieno[3,2- b;6,7- b ]carbazole ( C2 ) as D unit and thienopyrroledione ( TPD ), isoindigo ( IID ), or diketopyrrolopyrrole ( DPP ) as A unit were synthesized, and their semiconducting properties were investigated with organic field-effect transistors (OFETs). Because of different bonding geometry of C1 and C2, the CPs based on these isomeric D units have distinct backbone conformation. The CPs based on C1 unit and all three A units show strong backbone curvature. In consequence, these polymers all formed amorphous films and exhibited low OFET mobility in the level of 10 –3 cm 2 /(V s). P(TPD-C2) and P(DPP-C2), which comprise C2 and TPD or DPP, both display pseudo-straight-shaped backbones and formed ordered films with the polymer backbones adopting edge-on orientation respective to the substrates. Accordingly, P(TPD-C2) and P(DPP-C2) exhibited the highest mobility of 0.31 and 1.36 cm 2 /(V s), respectively. However, P(IID-C2) could only form amorphous films probably owing to its highly stiff backbone, leading to a moderate OFET mobility (2.96 × 10 –2 cm 2 /(V s)). This implies that large fused aromatics are promising building blocks for high-mobility D–A CPs when polymer backbone conformation and rigidity are appropriately manipulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: