Why the study?
The prognostic impact of non-obstructive CAD has long been underestimated due to its mild stenosis, prompting investigation into the prognostic value of atherosclerotic extent in diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD.
Does a higher atherosclerotic extent (SIS ≥3) increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD?
Does a higher atherosclerotic extent (SIS ≥3) increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD?
In diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD, a higher atherosclerotic extent (SIS ≥3) on CCTA is associated with a twofold increased risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to those with SIS <3.
May identify higher MACE risk among DM patients with non-obstructive CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The prognostic impact of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) has long been underestimated due to its mild stenosis (<50% stenosis). We aim to investigate the prognostic value of atherosclerotic extent in DM patients with non-obstructive CAD. The analysis was based on a single center cohort of DM patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) due to suspect CAD in 2015–2017. Based on coronary stenosis combined with segment involvement score (SIS), the study population were divided into four groups: normal (0% stenosis), non-obstructive SIS<3, non-obstructive SIS≥3 and obstructive (≥50% stenosis). The intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to test the inter-and intra-reviewer agreement. Multivariate Cox model and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the effect size of atherosclerotic extent on the prognosis. In total, 1241 patients (age 60.2 ± 10.4 years, 54.1% male) were included, of which 50.2% were non-obstructive. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 131 MACEs (10.6%) were adjudicated, including 17 cardiovascular deaths, 28 non-fatal myocardial infarctions, 64 unstable anginas requiring hospitalization and 22 strokes. Incremental event rates could be observed across the four groups. After adjustment for age, gender, hyperlipidemia and presence of high-risk plaque, Hazard Ratio (HR) for non-obstructive SIS<3, non-obstructive SIS≥3 and the obstructive group was 1.84 (95%CI: 0.70–4.79), 3.71 (95%CI: 1.37–10.00) and 5.46 (95%CI: 2.18–13.69), respectively. Compared with non-obstructive SIS<3, non-obstructive SIS≥3 showed a significantly higher risk (HR:2.02 95%CI:1.11–3.68, p = 0.021). Similar results were demonstrated when Leiden risk score was used for sensitivity analysis. In DM patients with non-obstructive CAD, atherosclerotic extent was associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiac events at long-term follow-up. Efforts should be made to determine risk stratification for the management of DM patients with non-obstructive CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: