Why the study?
To assess whether the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in clinical practice were consistent with findings from the pivotal randomized clinical trial.
Does the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in routine clinical practice align with the findings from its pivotal randomized controlled trial in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in routine clinical practice align with the findings from its pivotal randomized controlled trial in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Edoxaban demonstrated consistent effectiveness for stroke prevention and lower rates of major bleeding in routine clinical practice compared to the pivotal ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.
Edoxaban in routine AF care was associated with low event rates; supports but does not replace RCT evidence from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48.
Background/Introduction ETNA-AF (ETNA) is a multinational, prospective, observational study evaluating the experience with edoxaban in the clinical practice of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized double-blind trial that tested the clinical benefits of edoxaban versus warfarin. The recommended dose is 60 mg, dose-reduced to 30 mg daily in patients with at least 1 of 3 label-indicated criteria (renal impairment [creatinine clearance: 15–≤50 mL/min], weight ≤60 kg, or concomitant use of potent P-glycoprotein inhibitors). Purpose We assessed whether the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in clinical practice were consistent with findings from the pivotal randomized clinical trial. Methods We obtained patient-level data from ETNA and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. We initially extracted patients from similar geographic regions, and then used propensity-score matching (PSM) to adjust key baseline characteristic differences between studies. The primary effectiveness endpoint was all stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and mortality; the safety endpoint was major bleeding (MB). We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare event rates for the clinical outcomes between ETNA and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Results 8,615 AF patients with CHADS2 score ≥2 received the 60 mg edoxaban recommended dose (5,462 ETNA; 3,153 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). After PSM, key baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the studies: mean age 71.0 years (SD: 9.07); for both ETNA and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 median CHA2DS2-VASc score and median HAS-BLED score were 4 and 2. The annualized incidence rate of SSE was 1.65% in ETNA vs 1.53% in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.49, 1.93; p=0.94). ETNA had similar annualized mortality, 2.81%, compared with ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, 2.34%, (HR 1.49; 95% CI 0.84, 2.63; p=0.17). MB was less frequent in ETNA vs ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (1.10% vs 3.56%; HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.14, 0.44; p<0.05). Findings were similar for the recommended 30 mg edoxaban reduced dose. Conclusions The effectiveness of edoxaban in clinical practice from a large registry was consistent with efficacy findings from the randomized controlled trial. We observed a lower rate of bleeding events in the ETNA observational study compared with the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caterina et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: