Why the study?
Does quantitative myocardial blush grade (G(max)/T(max)) predict follow-up left ventricular function in patients with first STEMI and NSTEMI compared to CMR and visual assessment?
Does quantitative myocardial blush grade (G(max)/T(max)) predict follow-up left ventricular function in patients with first STEMI and NSTEMI compared to CMR and visual assessment?
Quantitative myocardial blush grade (G(max)/T(max)) during cardiac catheterization is a highly accurate surrogate for predicting 6-month LV function in ACS patients, performing similarly to CMR and better than visual assessment.
Quantitative MBG may refine intraprocedural EF prediction in ACS; leaves open prospective validation versus CMR before practice change.
PURPOSE: To determine whether quantification of myocardial blush grade (MBG) during cardiac catheterization can aid the determination of follow-up left ventricular (LV)-function in patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). METHODS: We prospectively examined patients with first STEMI (n = 46) and NSTEMI (n = 49). ECG-gated angiographic series were used to quantify MBG by analyzing the time course of contrast agent intensity rise. Hereby, the parameter G(max)/T(max) was calculated, derived from the plateau of grey-level intensity (G(max)), divided by the time-to-peak intensity (T(max)). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) deemed as the standard reference for the estimation of infarct size, transmurality and of the LV-function at 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Cut-off values of G(max)/T(max)=5.7/sec and 3.8/sec, respectively, yielded similar accuracy as infarct transmurality for the prediction of follow-up ejection fraction >55% (AUC = 0.86 for STEMI and AUC = 0.90 for NSTEMI, by G(max)/T(max) and AUC = 0.85 for STEMI and AUC = 0.89 for NSTEMI, by infarct transmurality, respectively, P = NS). Both clearly surpassed the predictive value of visual MBG (AUC = 0.69 for STEMI and AUC = 0.68 for NSTEMI, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: G(max)/T(max) is an easy to acquire but highly valuable surrogate parameter for infarct size, which yields equally high accuracy with infarct transmurality and favorably compares with visually assessed blush grades for the prediction of follow-up LV-function in patients with acute ischemic syndromes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riedle et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: