Why the study?
Does long-term smoking alone cause worse myocardial perfusion defects compared to having a single cardiac risk factor like hypertension or diabetes?
Does long-term smoking alone cause worse myocardial perfusion defects compared to having a single cardiac risk factor like hypertension or diabetes?
Smoking as a sole risk factor is associated with a higher incidence of severe myocardial perfusion defects and scar tissue on SPECT imaging compared to having hypertension or diabetes alone.
Smoking may confer higher risk of severe defects than single other factors; hypothesis-generating for tailored SPECT risk stratification.
Objective: The aim of this work was to assess the effect of smoking as an independent coronary risk factor on Myocardial Perfusion detected by Thallium 201 or Tc99m Sesta MIBI SPECT study.Methods: This study included 200 patients, 100 who are smokers only (group A) without any cardiac risks and the other 100 (group B) were nonsmokers, but with single cardiac risk factor as hypertension or diabetes. Each was subjected to Dipyridamole (smokers 53, 47) or exercise (nonsmokers 51, 49) Thallium-201 or Tc99m SestaMIBI SPECT protocol.Results: Comparing smokers versus nonsmokers who have another one risk factor, smokers had : Lower age with ischemic heart disease 55 years versus 60 years; Higher heart rate during peak stress; higher blood pressure during peak stress; More incidence of chest pain during stress test; had the same degree of ischemic perfusion defect, but higher incidence of persistent LV dilatation (43% versus 28%), higher incidence of severe perfusion defects (68% versus 53%) and statistically significant higher incidence of scar tissue (52% versus 30%).Conclusion: Smoking is an independent risk factor equal to hypertension and diabetes but smokers has higher incidence of severe perfusion defects and scar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafla et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: