This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/Objectives: Natural killer (NK) cells play a crucial role in immune surveillance against melanoma, yet they frequently exhibit dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment. This study aims to establish an NK cell activation-related prognostic signature and identify potential druggable targets to overcome NK cell dysfunction. Methods: A prognostic signature was developed using the TCGA-SKCM cohort and validated across independent datasets. NK cell activation and cytotoxicity were evaluated in melanoma-NK-92MI co-culture systems via flow cytometry. Mechanistic studies employed Western blotting, co-immunoprecipitation, ELISA, and qRT-PCR. Single-cell RNA-seq data were used to analyze cell–cell communication. Results: A four-gene NK cell activation signature was identified and validated for prognostic significance across five independent melanoma datasets. Among the identified genes, cyclin B1 (CCNB1) emerged as a novel therapeutic target for overcoming NK cell resistance. In vivo, pharmacological inhibition of the CCNB1/Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) complex with RO-3306 significantly suppressed melanoma growth by enhancing NK cell infiltration and IFN-γ production. In vitro, CCNB1 knockdown in melanoma cells augmented NK-92MI activation, as evidenced by increased expression of CD69, CD107a, IFN-γ, and NKG2D, thereby improving NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Mechanistically, in melanoma cells, the CCNB1/CDK1 complex phosphorylates STAT3, activating the IL-6/STAT3 positive feedback loop, which upregulates PD-L1 and enables resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Beyond its role in immune evasion, CCNB1 also promoted melanoma invasiveness by inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) through the TGF-β-SMAD2/3 signaling. Conclusions: This study establishes CCNB1/CDK1 as a novel immunotherapeutic target and uncovers a new role for CDK1 inhibitors in enhancing NK cell function and suppressing melanoma progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: