Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims and Method Services were compared for the management of deliberate self-harm with existing national guidance. A postal survey was sent to all clinical directors of adult psychiatry at all NHS trusts assessing adult patients admitted to general hospital following deliberate self-harm in England. Results Responses were received from 129 (65%) trusts.Thirty per cent of trusts do not use secondary psychiatric services for psycho-social assessment following deliberate self-harm; 52% have designated self-harm liaison staff and 69% of general hospitals have a ward to which most cases of deliberate selfharm are admitted. However, only 18% have staff with psychiatric experience. In 82% of trusts training is provided for junior psychiatrists at induction but in only 56% are observed-assessments undertaken. Forty-two per cent of the trusts have a deliberate self-harm services planning group. Clinical Implications Standards for deliberate self-harm services fall substantially below existing national guidelines, particularly in the areas of planning and training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slinn et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: