Why the study?
Does non-rib-spreading 3D fully endoscopic MIMVS improve postoperative pain and recovery compared to standard rib-spreading MIMVS in patients undergoing mitral valve repair?
Does non-rib-spreading 3D fully endoscopic MIMVS improve postoperative pain and recovery compared to standard rib-spreading MIMVS in patients undergoing mitral valve repair?
Non-rib-spreading 3D fully endoscopic mitral valve surgery reduces operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative pain without compromising repair quality compared to standard rib-spreading techniques.
Objectives: Advances in video-assistance lead to an increase of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) with decreased incision size, and at the same time improved visual guidance. Further reduction of invasiveness by a non-rib-spreading (NRS) 3D fully endoscopic technique leads to quicker postoperative recovery and reduced pain. Methods: Since June 2013 fully endoscopic NRS-MIMIVS was performed in 100 patients (43% female, age 56.9 ± 12.2 years) with a 3–4cm incision in the inframammary fold through the fourth intercostal space, using only a soft-tissue-retractor . In 10 male patients reduced incision along the periareolar margin was performed. Visualization was provided by 3D-endoscopy in 80 patients. The NRS-MIMIVS group was matched with 100 patients who underwent standard rib-spreading (RS-)MIMVS (36% female, age 58.7 ± 13.3 years). Surgical data, repair results, NYHA, pain-scales and freedom from MACCE were compared early postop and at 1 year follow-up. 3 month follow-up was 98% complete in both groups, 1-year follow-up was 98% complete in 50 patients of the NRS-MIMVS group and 98% in the RS-MIMVS group. Results: Valve repair was successful in all patients without technical limitations. Mortality was 0% in both groups. Significant differences between groups were seen for operation times (delta = 26.6 minute shorter in the NRS group, p < 0.001), and length of stay on ICU (delta = 0.9 days shorter in the NRS group, p = 0.001) and in hospital (delta = 1.7 days shorter in the NRS group, p < 0.001). Ventilation-times on ICU were shorter in the NRS-group (delta = 2.0 hour; p = 0.003). Postoperative pain rated on a pain-scale from 0–10 was significantly lower in the NRS group (delta= 0.6; p = 0.030). Follow-up echocardiography showed sufficient repair in all patients of both groups with 88% showing no recurrent MR and 12% ≤ grade 1 in the NRS group versus 84% no recurrent MR and 16% ≤ grade 1 in the RS group after 3 months (at 1 year follow-up: 86% no MR, 4% ≤ grade 1 versus 85% no MR, 5% ≤ grade 1 (NRS versusRS)). Patients of both groups showed significantly improved NYHA classes early postoperative and after 1 year without significant differences between groups. Conclusion: A less invasive procedure supported by 3D-visualization leads to shorter operation times, early mobilization and shorter hospitalization with reduced postoperative pain, while maintaining consistent quality of repair results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westhofen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: