Why the study?
Does a 3D-contour ring improve functional and echocardiographic outcomes compared to a 2D ring in patients undergoing surgical tricuspid valve reconstruction for high grade functional TR?
Does a 3D-contour ring improve functional and echocardiographic outcomes compared to a 2D ring in patients undergoing surgical tricuspid valve reconstruction for high grade functional TR?
A 3D-contour ring for surgical tricuspid valve reconstruction showed a trend toward improved tricuspid regurgitation and NYHA class at 1 year compared to a 2D ring.
Objectives: Three-dimensional, anatomically shaped remodeling rings were recently introduced to improve functional results of surgical tricuspid annuloplasty (TVR) for correction of hemodynamically relevant insufficiency. We analyzed results achieved with such a ring (3D-contour, Medtronic) and compared them to those of a matched patient population where a two-dimensional “Physio” ring was used. Material and methods: Since February 2013 3D Contour rings were implanted in 50 patients (Gr.1; 46% female, age 68.5 ± 11.9 years) with high grade functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) . We compared this group with an age, gender and preoperative diagnoses matched group of 50 patients who received a Physio Tricuspid ring (Edwards) (Gr.2; 42.6% female, age 69.0 ± 9.2 years) focusing on functional and echocardiographic results at discharge and 1-year-follow-up. Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups with regards to atrial fibrillation (76.1% versus 85.2%), mean NYHA score (2.7 ± 0.5 versus 2.9 ± 0.4)),and mean TR (3.3 ± 0.7 vs 2.9 ± 0.68) in Gr.1 versus Gr.2 . Preoperative RV function was moderately reduced in 42%in Gr.1 and 34% in Gr.2.n Gr.1 TVR was combined with mitral valve surgery in 84.0%, isolated TVR performed in 10.0%, in group 2 all patients had concomitant mitral valve surgery. Additional CABG, AVR and closure of ASD was performed in isolated patients of both groups. 1-year follow-up was 100% complete in both groups. Results: Postoperative echo at dischargeshowed competent valves withoutany TR in 89% in Gr.1 and 81´% in Gr.2, with all other patients with TR ≤ 1. At 1 year follow-up mean TR was 1.7 ± 0.3 versus 2.2 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.058) and mean NYHA score 1.7 ± 0.5 versus 2.3 ± 0.6 ( p = 0.06) in Gr.1 versus Gr 2. respectively. RV function improved in Gr.1and remained stable in Gr.2 (moderate dysfunction 26% versus 36% Gr.1 versus Gr.2) Concomitant atrial ablation was performed significantly more often in Gr. 2 (76.8% versus 40.5% in Gr.1; p < 0.05), incidence of postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation was not significant different between groups (43.8% versus 48.4%; Gr. 1 versus 2) nor was overall MACE at 1 year follow up. Conclusion: Both tricuspid rings showed excellent repair results at discharge. At 1 year follow-up, patients in the 3D Contour ring group tended to show lesser degree of TR, better RV function and lower NYHA scoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westhofen et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: