Why the study?
Patient characteristics and medical provider factors can affect length of stay under diagnosis-related groups payment, but the relationship in primary total hip arthroplasty patients is uncertain.
Patient characteristics (comorbidities, low albumin, high CRP) and provider factors (surgery date, urinary catheter, incision drainage) are significantly associated with prolonged length of stay in primary total hip arthroplasty patients.
Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment in the improvement of quality of life. Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) payment has a significant impact on the hospital market in China and length of stay (LOS) is one of its crucial manifestations. Patient characteristics and medical provider factors can affect LOS but the relationship is uncertain. We intent to explore the relationship between patient characteristics and medical provider factors and LOS of primary THA patients. Methods We reviewed the database containing 461 patients who underwent primary THA between January 2014 to January 2019 and regressed the LOS against a variety of perioperative factors. A multivariable linear regression model was performed to assess the difference. Results For parts of patient characteristics, multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that comorbidities, pre-operation albumin < 30 g/L, and pre-operation CRP ≥ 5 mg/L were all significantly associated with LOS ( p < 0.05). For parts of medical provider factors, multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that date of surgery, urinary catheter, and incision drainage were all significantly associated with LOS ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Patient characteristics and medical provider factors are associated with LOS of THA patients. Evaluation and identification of risk factors are beneficial in patients' education, perioperative discussion and surgery decisions in the different primary THA patient populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: