Why the study?
Does intravenous nitroglycerin followed by leg elevation alter carbon monoxide diffusion capacity and hemodynamics in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction?
Does intravenous nitroglycerin followed by leg elevation alter carbon monoxide diffusion capacity and hemodynamics in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction?
Intravenous nitroglycerin reduces pulmonary capillary filling and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity in acute MI, an effect that is partially reversed by elevating the legs.
NTG may confound DLCO interpretation in acute MI; leaves open clinical relevance and need for protocol adjustments in future studies.
Hemodynamic and respiratory variables were measured in 18 supine patients with acute myocardial infarction uncomplicated by left ventricular failure. Measurements were done during a control period and then when pulmonary capillary bed filling was decreased by iv injection of 3 mg nitroglycerin (NTG) and finally when pulmonary capillary bed filling was increased by raising the patients' legs. Heart rate increased significantly (p less than .05) ventricular filling, and mean aortic pressures dropped significantly (p less than .001) after NTG injection. Heart rate and mean aortic pressure returned to control level and ventricular filling pressures increased significantly (p less than .001) after elevating patients' legs. Mean carbon monoxide diffusion capacity decreased significantly (p less than .01) from 9.8 +/- 3.4 to 8.5 +/- 2.9 ml/min X mm Hg after NTG injection and increased significantly (p less than .02) to 9.3 +/- 3.5 ml/min X mm Hg after elevating patients' legs. Pulmonary wedge pressure decreased significantly (p less than .001) from 15 +/- 5 to 8 +/- 4 mm Hg after NTG injection and increased significantly (p less than .001) to 10 +/- 4 mm Hg after elevating patients' legs. We conclude that NTG reduces pulmonary capillary filling and pulmonary diffusion by reducing the available pulmonary gas exchange surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: