We have examined the [Na/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios in a sample of 68 Ðeld halo giants with We recalculated the Galactic (U, V , W ) velocity components for these stars, usingHipparcos proper motions and a new Hipparcos-based distance scale.We used these data to see how the abundance ratios may relate to kinematical substructure in the Galactic halo.To isolate a set of true halo stars, we eliminated metal-weak thick-disk stars, about 10% of our sample.The Ðeld halo giants show the expected correlation of Na and Mg abundances, so we can use Na as a surrogate for Mg and the a-elements.The most metal-poor stars show a wider dispersion of [Na/Fe] ratios than do the less metal-poor stars ; the di †erence is most striking for stars on retrograde galactic orbits.Some 20% of our retrograde giants and 13% of all our halo giants have [Na/Fe] ¹ [0.35 and may be signiÐcantly younger than the oldest halo objects.Halo giants considered "" young ÏÏ by this Na abundance criterion show a preference for retrograde orbits.Giants in some globular clusters (e.g., M13) do not exhibit the Mg versus Na correlation found among halo Ðeld giants.Instead, they have very large [Na/Fe] ratios and widely scattered [Mg/Fe] ratios, probably induced by deep mixing, which Ðeld halo giants apparently do not experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanson et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: