Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction In previous studies abnormal HCT levels and medication were identified as possible causes of inaccurate reading with BGM in daily routine. The GLUCOCARD S onyx (ARKRAY Inc.) BGM was evaluated over the wide HCT range of 20-70% as well as its impact on 27 common drug interferences listed by the ISO15197:2013/EN ISO15197:2015 in comparison to clinical laboratory reference methods.Methods Pooled venous whole blood samples of > 200 study participants were prepared to represent 4 different HCT concentrations from 20-70% and 3 different glucose concentrations from 60-360 mg/dL. Those were spiked with 27 potential interfering substances and tested with GLUCOCARD S onyx, Atellica CH for D-Glucose and Sysmex XN-10 for HCT confirmation.Results Pooled venous whole blood at glucose concentrations (60 ± 6, 130 ± 13 and 360 ± 30 mg/dL) were statistically analyzed (Levene, one-way ANOVA). A stable performance meeting the ISO15197:2013 acceptance criteria at HCT concentrations of 20-25, 42 ± 2, 55 ± 2 and 66-69% was observed (p > 0,05). Furthermore, the 27 chemical substances did not show any significant difference (p > 0,05) among the averages, except for Ascorbic acid (>6 mg/dL), Sodium (>180 mmol/L) and Xylose (>600 mg/dL). Ascorbic acid at 3 mg/dL showed no more interference and Sodium at 90 mmol/L showed no interference anymore for normal to low glucose readings.Conclusion The GLUCOCARD S onyx BGM was evaluated under conditions equivalent to routine clinical practice as defined by ISO15197:2013. Correct glucose readings over a wide HCT range (20-70%) besides medication were obtained with GLUCOCARD S onyx, allowing patients to manage their diabetes with confidence and healthcare providers to treat diabetes in complex clinical scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burrini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: