For the past two years, measurements have been performed with a watt balance at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to determine the Planck constant. A detailed analysis of these measurements and their uncertainties has led to the value h=6.626\,069\,79(30)× 10⁻³⁴\,J$\,$s. The relative standard uncertainty is 45× 10⁻⁹. This result is 141× 10⁻⁹ fractionally higher than h₉₀. Here h₉₀ is the conventional value of the Planck constant given by h₉₀≡ 4 /( KJ-90²RK-90), where KJ-90 and RK-90 denote the conventional values of the Josephson and von Klitzing constants, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlamminger et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: