Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The heavy ion beam probe (HIBP) measures localized density fluctuations in the plasma interior. These measurements can be used to calculate two point estimates of interior poloidal wave numbers. The results so far show wave numbers significantly lower than FIR scattering wave numbers and drift wave expectations. Experiments were performed on TEXT to look for possible sources of error in our wave number calculations. The HIBP effects that are considered the possible dominant error terms are finite sample volume size and path effect fluctuations as well as the possible existence of counter-propagating modes. An aperture experiment showed the presence of a finite sample volume effect, but not large enough to correct the measured wave numbers significantly. Simulations using HIBP data show that our processing techniques detect counter-propagating modes. Path effects are discussed. The error analysis so far shows the HIBP calculations to be accurate wave number measurements, but more study on path effects is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heard et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: