A culture-independent and two culture-dependent real time (rt-) PCR approaches were developed to quantitatively identify Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk and soft cheeses. The optimised rt-PCR revealed 100% inclusivity and exclusivity. DNA- and cell-based standard curves showed a good linearity of response (R2 ≥ 0.987 and R2 ≥ 0.998, respectively) for five orders of magnitude (39 × 105 – 3 × 100 genome equivalents and 106–101 CFU equivalents, respectively) with about 100% relative accuracy and inter-assay variability ≤0.90%. Up to 1 genome equivalent/and 10 CFU/reaction were quantified in the DNA and cell standard curves, respectively. The rt-PCR was then combined with a liquid- (MPN technique) or a solid- (ALOA and PALCAM) based enumeration. The diagnostic sensitivity of the different approaches was investigated in artificially contaminated raw milk and soft cheeses. The rt-PCR culture-independent approach performed well in raw milk and (with a lower sensitivity) in stracchino cheese-based standard curves. MPN/rt-PCR was the best approach to enumerate low levels of L. monocytogenes in raw milk and stracchino cheese, while the ALOA-based rt-PCR quantification was more effective than the PALCAM-based. These performances were confirmed when 23 real samples of raw milk and soft cheeses by both the rt-PCR approaches were assayed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quero et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: