Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A principal components analysis of the WAIS–R is reported, the results of which resemble closely those of previous analyses of the WAIS. A single component, labelled ‘general ability’, accounted for most of the variance in the subtests. It is argued that the second component (‘verbal‐spatial contrast’) should also be retained on both statistical and neuropsychological grounds. Varimax rotation yielded two orthogonal components, labelled ‘verbal–general: vg’ and ‘spatial–performance: sp’, respectively. Short forms of the WAIS–R are considered, and an example is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canavan et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: