Heat recovery from local resources is shown to be a promising solution to reduce the carbon footprint of district heating. Supermarkets equipped with a CO2 refrigeration system and a geothermal storage offer a larger heating capacity, compared to traditional solutions. While district heat could benefit from this higher heat recovery availability, supermarkets could generate an income from a capacity that would be otherwise unused. For the first time, this study applies a detailed modelling approach considering both sides of such a synergy. The objective is to assess the techno-economic and environmental impact of a coordinated control strategy. Since the heat recovery from the supermarket consumes additional electricity, power-to-heat is implemented as a solution to reduce the overall CO2 emissions. This is demonstrated by scenarios simulated for a district in Stockholm. Hourly electricity CO2 intensity and prices are implemented as signals to prioritize either the district heating central supply or heat recovery. By boosting the use of electricity when cleaner, a CO2 intensity-driven control show the potential of reducing the carbon footprint of the district (−9.4%). A control based on prices, instead, is more convenient economically both for the district (−1.4% heat cost) and for the supermarket (−32% operational cost).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnaudo et al. (2020) studied this question.