This study presents an experimental investigation into the cyclic performance of a new tube-in-tube buckling restrained brace (BRB) configuration. In this study, reduced- and large-scale brace geometries are tested to quantify inelastic hysteretic response, understand core confinement parameters, and determine the influence of end connection constraints. A total of 11 reduced-scale brace specimens are cyclically tested, along with three large-scale braces representing two core geometries and two core constraint configurations. Results from the reduced- and large-scale brace testing suggest that the tube-in-tube BRB configurations are capable of achieving the required inelastic capacity for qualification in AISC 341-16 specifications. All scaled specimens survived cumulative inelastic demands that exceeded 240 times the yield displacement (with several surviving more than 400 times the yield displacement). Results indicate that tube-in-tube BRBs are capable of producing stable tension-compression hysteretic behavior during cyclic loading. Measured β values for the large-scale Specimen G2 were lower than 1.06 for all deformation cycles at or below 9.2Δby, while measured β values for the large-scale Specimen G3 were lower than 1.07 for all cycles at or below 3.6Δby. The peak β value for Specimens G2 and G3 was 1.16 and occurred during the 15.3Δby and 7.1Δby cycles, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prinz et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Structural Engineering