Why the study?
Does telmisartan or its combination with ramipril improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to ramipril alone in high-risk patients?
Does telmisartan or its combination with ramipril improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to ramipril alone in high-risk patients?
Telmisartan is an effective and better-tolerated alternative to the ACE inhibitor ramipril for cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk patients, whereas combining the two agents offers no additional benefit and increases adverse effects.
Supports telmisartan as ramipril alternative for tolerability in high-risk patients; leaves open optimal combination strategies for targeted trials.
The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) has been a drug target of particular interest because of its involvement in the cardiovascular and renal disease progression. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the selective angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit the RAS by different mechanisms of action that may have therapeutic implications. The ACE inhibitors have been proven effective for reducing cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Evidence from clinical trials has shown that ARBs and ACE inhibitors can reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal events in specific patient populations. Ramipril is an ACE inhibitor proven, in the HOPE trial, to reduce cardiovascular risk. Telmisartan is an ARB with a high degree of lipophilicity, tissue penetration, and high affinity for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. The ONTARGET study demonstrated that telmisartan provided equivalent efficacy to ramipril in preventing morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes in a broad cross section of high-risk patients, but with better tolerability and fewer discontinuations. The combination of telmisartan and ramipril was no more effective but was associated with worse tolerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T Unger (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: