Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This qualitative study examines the gendering of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Education plays an important role in the socialization process, and one of the ways people learn how to perform their gendered identities is through the institutions they interact with and within. Through an analysis of course syllabi, this study investigates the hidden gender curriculum in the STEM disciplines. At first glance, many of the syllabi appear gender-neutral and even instances of gender-inclusive language are present. The formal curriculum states the acquisition of knowledge, understanding of the material, and learning new skills as the primary goals of the courses. However, certain messages reveal a hidden gender curriculum. In particular, four gendered themes emerge from the syllabi: women as incompetent, autonomy and separation, women as supporters, and masculine thinking. As these findings suggest, the hidden curriculum within the syllabi normalizes masculinity, consequently disenfranchising femininity and other gender identities and therefore perpetuating gendered divisions in academia. Suggestions for how to address this problem are included in the Discussion section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bejerano et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: