Convective-controlled double high flux hemodiafiltration (CC-DHF) was set-up using two high flux dialyzers. The convection occurred in the first while the fluid replacement took place in the second dialyzer. The system of CC-DHF basically resembled that of hemodiafiltration. CC-DHF was performed in 9 chronic hemodialysis Thai patients who had been treated with high flux hemodialysis for at least 6 months. When compared with high flux hemodialysis, CC-DHF could provide higher Kt/Vurea (2.4+/-0.4 vs. 2.0+/-0.4, p<0.05) and beta2-microglobulin clearance (106.2+/-15.4 vs. 48.9+/-6.1 ml/min, p<0.01). Following 6-month therapy of CC-HDF, the predialysis beta2-microglobulin levels were reduced by 12.7% while the values of Kt/Vurea were consistently higher than 2.7. The quality of life consistently improved during the 6 months of CC-DHF treatment. There were no differences in clinical and technical complications between CC-DHF and high flux hemodialysis. In conclusion, CC-DHF could provide performance comparable to hemodiafiltration without the need for expensive hemodiafiltration machines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pisitkun et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: